Strategies for Influencing Corporate Policy Change Through Direct Action: The Case of Joseph Cunningham of South Carolina & the Snapchat Lawsuit

288
SHARE
The Case of Joseph Cunningham of South Carolina & the Snapchat Lawsuit

In an era where digital platforms profoundly influence our lives, the consequences of their operation extend far beyond simple connectivity, often impacting personal safety and security. As seen in the increasing number of lawsuits against social media companies, there is a pressing need for significant changes in how these companies operate. Joseph Cunningham, a former U.S. Congressman turned attorney, is at the forefront of a legal battle that underscores a proactive approach to enforcing corporate policy changes directly, especially concerning the safety of minors on platforms like Snapchat.

Understanding the Background

Joseph Cunningham of South Carolina, known for his tenure as a Democratic Congressman from Charleston, has transitioned back to his legal roots, taking on significant cases with potentially far-reaching consequences. One such case is the high-profile lawsuit against Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat, following the tragic death of a young teenager due to a phenomenon known as “sextortion.” This lawsuit, among others, aims to challenge and ultimately change how social media platforms manage user safety and content regulation.

The Basis of the Snapchat Lawsuit

The lawsuit filed by Joseph Cunningham of South Carolina and his legal team alleges that Snapchat played a “direct role” in the teenager’s death by maintaining a platform that is defectively designed and “unreasonably dangerous” for minors. The lawsuit highlights several systemic issues with Snapchat, including inadequate age verification processes, unsafe user interfaces, and insufficient parental control mechanisms that fail to protect minors from adult predators.

Strategic Legal Approaches

  1. Direct Litigation: The primary strategy employed by Joseph Cunningham of South Carolina is direct litigation against the company. By holding the company legally accountable for its platform’s design and operation, the lawsuit seeks to compel Snap Inc. to implement substantial changes. This method follows a legal precedent similar to cases against tobacco and opioid manufacturers, where companies were found liable for harm caused by their products.
  2. Public Awareness and Media Engagement: Engaging the public and leveraging media coverage is a crucial strategy in shaping public opinion and increasing pressure on companies to change. By highlighting the risks associated with Snapchat’s current policies and the direct impact on users’ safety, Cunningham’s case garners public support for stricter regulations, creating an environment where corporate change becomes a necessity rather than an option.
  3. Legislative Advocacy: Having served in Congress, Cunningham understands the power of legislative change. While the lawsuit progresses, advocating for federal and state-level legislation that enforces stricter age verification and user safety protocols on social media platforms is another layer of applying pressure. Such legislation can complement legal efforts by setting a regulatory framework that all social media platforms must follow.

Challenges and Considerations

The legal path to policy change is fraught with challenges. One significant hurdle is Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which provides broad immunity to online platforms from being held liable for user-posted content. This law is a considerable shield that has historically protected social media companies from numerous lawsuits. Overcoming this requires a nuanced legal approach that distinguishes negligent design from content-based immunity.

Furthermore, the implications for free speech and privacy are significant. Any changes to how platforms operate could impact these fundamental rights. Balancing safety with privacy and free speech requires careful consideration and is often a central debate in these cases.

Potential Outcomes and Impacts

If successful, the lawsuit led by Joseph Cunningham of South Carolina could set a landmark precedent for how social media companies are regulated concerning user safety. It could lead to more robust age verification processes, better safety features, and more transparent user agreements that clearly outline the risks and controls available to users. Additionally, it could catalyze similar actions against other platforms, leading to a broader shift in the industry towards prioritizing user safety over user engagement.

Joseph Cunningham’s strategic approach to tackling the inherent issues within social media platforms through direct litigation, public engagement, and legislative advocacy highlights a comprehensive method to effectuate policy change. While the challenges are significant, the potential for creating a safer online environment for minors justifies the efforts. As this legal battle unfolds, it may well set the stage for a new era of digital responsibility where user safety is placed at the forefront of corporate policy.

Joseph Cunningham of South Carolina emphasizes that by adopting these strategies, individuals and legal teams across the globe can take a proactive stance in demanding accountability and safety reforms from corporations, particularly those whose operations have a profound impact on public well-being.